Am I affected?
This record states its affected versions in a form that can't be compared automatically.
Description
OCSP response verification in pubkey_ocsp:verify_response/5 and pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3 in lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl does not check the validity period (notBefore/notAfter) of the OCSP responder certificate. An attacker who has obtained the private key of an expired CA-designated OCSP responder certificate can forge OCSP responses that Erlang/OTP accepts as valid.
This affects TLS clients using OCSP stapling via the ssl application: a malicious or compromised server can present a revoked TLS certificate together with a forged OCSP response signed by an expired responder key, and the client will accept the revoked certificate as valid. It also affects applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly, where the impact depends on the use case — server-side client certificate validation using this API may allow authentication bypass with a revoked client certificate.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 29.0.1, OTP 28.5.0.1 and OTP 27.3.4.12, corresponding to public_key from 1.16 before 1.21.1, 1.20.3.1 and 1.17.1.3.
Weaknesses & attack patterns
Weakness
CWE-295
·
Improper Certificate Validation
in catalog →
MITRE ↗
CWE-672
·
Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release
in catalog →
MITRE ↗
Attack patterns
CAPEC-475
·
Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
MITRE ↗
Affected — Erlang / public_key Repository ↗
modules · source files · routines
Affected — GitHub / erlang/otp Repository ↗
modules · source files · routines
Workarounds
- For TLS clients using the ssl application, disable OCSP stapling by setting {stapling, no_staple} in the client options, or switch to CRL-based revocation checking with {crl_check, true}.
- For applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly, validate the responder certificate's validity period in application code before calling the function.
Configurations
Applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly are unconditionally affected when that function is used.
References
GHSA-cjxj-wj6x-3fff ↗
vendor-advisory
EEF-CVE-2026-42791 ↗
related
Credits
CVSS breakdown
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N