Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to obtain paid resources by resubmitting one settled on-chain transfer.
\nMPP.Methods.EVM.verify/2 accepts a transaction-hash credential and matches a transfer purely on token, to and amount (ERC-20) or to and value (native). It binds the proof neither to the challenge being verified nor to any record of prior use, and the generic MPP.Plug dedup store keys on challenge.id, which is regenerated for every 402 response. On a static-price route, a single historical transfer matching the charge therefore satisfies an unbounded number of later charges, including transfers an attacker can read off a public block explorer.
This issue affects mpp: from 0.3.0 before 0.6.3.
"},{"base64":false,"type":"text/markdown","value":"Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to obtain paid resources by resubmitting one settled on-chain transfer.\n\n`MPP.Methods.EVM.verify/2` accepts a transaction-hash credential and matches a transfer purely on `token`, `to` and `amount` (ERC-20) or `to` and `value` (native). It binds the proof neither to the challenge being verified nor to any record of prior use, and the generic `MPP.Plug` dedup store keys on `challenge.id`, which is regenerated for every 402 response. On a static-price route, a single historical transfer matching the charge therefore satisfies an unbounded number of later charges, including transfers an attacker can read off a public block explorer.\n\nThis issue affects mpp: from 0.3.0 before 0.6.3."}],"value":"Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to obtain paid resources by resubmitting one settled on-chain transfer.\n\nMPP.Methods.EVM.verify/2 accepts a transaction-hash credential and matches a transfer purely on token, to and amount (ERC-20) or to and value (native). It binds the proof neither to the challenge being verified nor to any record of prior use, and the generic MPP.Plug dedup store keys on challenge.id, which is regenerated for every 402 response. On a static-price route, a single historical transfer matching the charge therefore satisfies an unbounded number of later charges, including transfers an attacker can read off a public block explorer.\n\nThis issue affects mpp: from 0.3.0 before 0.6.3."}],"impacts":[{"capecId":"CAPEC-60","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"CAPEC-60 Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.7,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-294","description":"CWE-294 Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-19T17:20:09.606Z","orgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","shortName":"EEF"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory","related"],"url":"https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-vp5h-xh25-44wf"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-67581.html"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-67581"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/ecc038088b1cda09ad8a84acc6cc112addb4a68f"}],"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"title":"On-chain transfer proof is not single-use in mpp EVM payment method, enabling cross-challenge replay","workarounds":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Price each challenge uniquely (per-challenge or single-use amounts) so that a historical transfer cannot match a later charge, and keep challenge expiry short to narrow the window in which any given transfer stays useful. Deployments that can use the Tempo method for on-chain payments get per-challenge attribution binding instead.
"},{"base64":false,"type":"text/markdown","value":"Price each challenge uniquely (per-challenge or single-use amounts) so that a historical transfer cannot match a later charge, and keep challenge expiry short to narrow the window in which any given transfer stays useful. Deployments that can use the Tempo method for on-chain payments get per-challenge attribution binding instead."}],"value":"Price each challenge uniquely (per-challenge or single-use amounts) so that a historical transfer cannot match a later charge, and keep challenge expiry short to narrow the window in which any given transfer stays useful. Deployments that can use the Tempo method for on-chain payments get per-challenge attribution binding instead."}]}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","assignerShortName":"EEF","cveId":"CVE-2026-67581","datePublished":"2026-08-19T17:20:09.606Z","dateReserved":"2026-08-18T10:30:01.759Z","dateUpdated":"2026-08-19T17:20:09.606Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"}