Am I affected?
Description
httpd has never implemented obs-fold (RFC 2616 §2.2 / RFC 7230 §3.2.4 header continuation lines). Every CRLF followed by a non-CRLF octet unconditionally starts a new header. This missing feature became a security concern as the understanding of HTTP request smuggling attacks evolved.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.
Weaknesses & attack patterns
Weakness
CWE-444
·
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
in catalog →
MITRE ↗
Attack patterns
CAPEC-33
·
HTTP Request Smuggling
MITRE ↗
Affected — Erlang
Affected — pkg:otp/inets Repository ↗
Affected — GitHub / erlang/otp Repository ↗
References
GHSA-qh2f-33hj-37qf ↗
vendor-advisory
EEF-CVE-2026-66357 ↗
related
Credits
CVSS breakdown
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N